This article examines the ICJ’s interpretation of the Paris Agreement’s core mitigation obligations to determine how, on what basis, and to what effect the ICJ disciplined national determination in the operation of the Paris Agreement. In so doing, it analyses the extent to which the ICJ’s interpretation strengthens the legal character of the Paris Agreement’s mitigation obligations. It argues that while the ICJ’s interpretation strengthens the legal character of the Paris Agreement’s mitigation obligations along some dimensions, notably normative content, language and precision, along the dimensions of oversight and review, national determination is still dominant, thus potentially diluting the operational impact of the ICJ’s robust reframing of the Paris Agreement’s mitigation obligations.
The International Court of Justice on the mitigation obligations in the Paris Agreement
Publication details
The urgency of zero
Research paper
Rajamani, Lavanya
2026
Latest news

Dr Radhika Khosla awarded the title of Professor of Environmental Science and Policy
Dr Radhika Khosla, formerly Associate Professor and researcher at the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, has been awarded the title of Professor of Environmental Science and Policy. The title was awarded ... Read more

Here’s how to make North Sea drilling compatible with net zero
By Professor Myles Allen, Founding Director of Oxford Net Zero and Head of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford. Originally published by the Financial Times on 29 July 2026. Republished with permission. Click here ... Read more

Job opening: Executive Officer, Impact and Engagement (now closed)
THIS OPPORTUNITY IS NOW CLOSED. Oxford Net Zero is seeking an organised and proactive Executive Officer to support its policy engagement and impact activities focused on corporate climate action, accountability, and net zero governance. ... Read more
See more news and events